{"id":1114,"date":"2005-04-28T14:41:00","date_gmt":"2005-04-28T14:41:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sustainablog.greenoptions.com\/2005\/04\/28\/energy-plan-round-up\/"},"modified":"2005-04-28T14:41:00","modified_gmt":"2005-04-28T14:41:00","slug":"energy-plan-round-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sustainablog.org\/articles\/energy-plan-round-up\/","title":{"rendered":"Energy Plan Round-Up"},"content":{"rendered":"
As you might imagine, the Sustainable and political blogospheres are abuzz over Dubya’s speech on energy policy yesterday<\/a>. While watching CNN for a few minutes yesterday, I hear Lou Dobbs call it “bold.” I actually kind of like Lou, but “bold?” Fortunately, Lou seems to be unique in his characterization:<\/p>\n There’s nothing in Bush’s speech about conservation, nothing about a major initiative to fund R&D, nothing about the need for Americans to try and cut their usage of gasoline, nothing, in fact, that’ll have any long-term impact on the situation. What we have is a politician offering a pro forma response to a high gasoline prices, nothing more. There’s no vision, long-term planning, or even new ideas in this proposal, and so it contains nothing to get excited over.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/li>\n Of course, all of this is a side-show: the real action is still going on in Congress as the House and Senate try to reconcile the budget<\/a> (which includes drilling in ANWR), and the energy bill.<\/p>\n Update: Just wondering: did Dubya use the word “recycling” in discussing his use of old military bases for oil refineries and nuclear power plants? I’d expect as much from a guy who describes nuclear power as “renewable.”<\/p>\n Technorati tags: energy<\/a>, politics<\/a><\/p>\n\n
\n