{"id":13309,"date":"2011-08-22T13:51:42","date_gmt":"2011-08-22T19:51:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.sustainablog.org\/?p=13309"},"modified":"2011-08-22T13:51:42","modified_gmt":"2011-08-22T19:51:42","slug":"bicycling-benefits-economic-growth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sustainablog.org\/articles\/bicycling-benefits-economic-growth\/","title":{"rendered":"Economic Growth: Another Benefit of Bicycling"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n A few months ago, I took note of Jay Walljasper’s arguments for public investment in bicycling infrastructure<\/a>: in short, government spending on trails and bike lanes pays off in terms of increased ridership. That’s a good thing, of course — people are emitting less carbon and getting more exercise — but what about financial payoff? Isn’t that the ultimate goal of investment?<\/p>\n We can argue about what kind of return public investment should seek, but we may not have to in this case: a new study from the London School of Economics<\/a> shows that bicycling<\/a> creates economic growth in the UK: about\u00a0\u00a3230 per cyclist per year, or\u00a0\u00a32.9 billion for the British economy as a whole. Among the drivers of this growth:<\/p>\n So, does this represent a huge segment of overall economic growth in the UK? Probably not. But it does represent a measurable return in terms of jobs created and tax revenues generated… in short, a solid investment.<\/p>\n Of course, we can’t just transpose this scenario on other countries, but we’ve also seen evidence of the economic benefits created by building bicycling infrastructure in the United States: the Political Economy Research Unit’s findings that, in at least one case, the building of bike infrastructure created more jobs than road construction<\/a>.<\/p>\n Yes, there are plenty of folks out there (maybe even a few reading this right now) that will see “government spending,” and immediately respond with “That’s bad…” But if we’re seeing financial payback from that spending — in addition to lower carbon emissions, cleaner air, and healthier citizens — isn’t that exactly the kind of “spending” we want? Doesn’t that represent fiscal responsibility?<\/p>\n I’ve read through the report, but no doubt didn’t pick up every detail the first go-through… so if you see something that needs highlighting, do so…<\/p>\n via The Guardian<\/a><\/p>\n Image credit:<\/strong> SVLuma<\/a>\/Shutterstock<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A few months ago, I took note of Jay Walljasper’s arguments for public investment in bicycling infrastructure: in short, government spending on trails and bike lanes pays off in terms [ … ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":13310,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60,13],"tags":[823,5289,10,5290,5291,202],"yoast_head":"\n\n