{"id":1782,"date":"2005-11-29T16:48:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-29T16:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sustainablog.greenoptions.com\/2005\/11\/29\/findings-on-us-nuclear-subsidies\/"},"modified":"2005-11-29T16:48:00","modified_gmt":"2005-11-29T16:48:00","slug":"findings-on-us-nuclear-subsidies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sustainablog.org\/articles\/findings-on-us-nuclear-subsidies\/","title":{"rendered":"Findings on US Nuclear Subsidies"},"content":{"rendered":"
Thanks to Doug Koplow at Earth Track<\/a> for passing along a link to a PowerPoint presentation on US government subsidies to the nuclear power industry<\/a>. I imagine there’s already been some heated discussion on this information, as it was presented at a symposium on nuclear power and climate change hosted by the anti-nuclear Nuclear Policy Research Institute<\/a>. Among the findings:<\/p>\n I’ll probably take a beating for simply presenting this information without comment, but I’m mostly interested in hearing responses. I’m still not convinced that nuclear power is the best answer for addressing climate change, but I’d rather open this up to more informed parties to discuss the implications of Earth Talks’ claims.<\/p>\n Categories: nuclear power<\/a>, subsidies<\/a>, USA<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Thanks to Doug Koplow at Earth Track for passing along a link to a PowerPoint presentation on US government subsidies to the nuclear power industry. I imagine there’s already been [ … ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n