{"id":1911,"date":"2006-02-25T06:59:00","date_gmt":"2006-02-25T06:59:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sustainablog.greenoptions.com\/2006\/02\/25\/gb-3-league-of-conservation-voters-national-scorecard-is-available\/"},"modified":"2006-02-25T06:59:00","modified_gmt":"2006-02-25T06:59:00","slug":"gb-3-league-of-conservation-voters-national-scorecard-is-available","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sustainablog.org\/articles\/gb-3-league-of-conservation-voters-national-scorecard-is-available\/","title":{"rendered":"GB #3: League of Conservation Voters National Scorecard is Available"},"content":{"rendered":"
I promise not to do politics all night, and I a few days late on this one, but I thought the 2005 League of Conservation Voters National Environmental Scorecard<\/a> definitely needed a mention. If you’re not familiar with the publication, it rates Senators and representatives on their environmental voting record for the past year. My own rep., Russ Carnahan<\/a>, has a very respectable 89%. My senators, on the other hand, suck: 15% for Jim Talent<\/a> (who, hopefully, will be outta’ there come November, and who looks like he’s 12), and a big goose egg for our senior senator Kit Bond<\/a>. Check on your own reps, and let them know you’re watching them!<\/p>\n Categories: greenblogathon2006<\/a>, environment<\/a>, politics<\/a>, senate<\/a>, houseofrepresentatives<\/a>, US<\/a>, bond<\/a>, talent<\/a>, carnahan<\/a>, Missouri<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I promise not to do politics all night, and I a few days late on this one, but I thought the 2005 League of Conservation Voters National Environmental Scorecard definitely [ … ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n