{"id":3436,"date":"2008-09-02T21:07:38","date_gmt":"2008-09-03T03:07:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wordpress-367309-1145705.cloudwaysapps.com\/?p=3436"},"modified":"2008-09-02T21:07:38","modified_gmt":"2008-09-03T03:07:38","slug":"california-farmers-using-unsustainable-extreme-practices-to-safeguard-crops-from-ecoli","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sustainablog.org\/articles\/california-farmers-using-unsustainable-extreme-practices-to-safeguard-crops-from-ecoli\/","title":{"rendered":"California Farmers Using Unsustainable, Extreme Practices to Safeguard Crops from E.coli"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Deer\"<\/a>How far should farmers go to ensure that consumers get their salad in a bag? According to an Associated Press article\u00a0Calif. farmers use guns, poison to protect crops<\/a>, some farmers are using some extreme, possibly unnecessary practices to keep E.coli and other bacteria out of their fields of greens.<\/p>\n

It’s understandable that farmers would want to make sure that deadly contaminants do not taint their crops given that in 2006 three people were killed and about 200 others became ill after eating fresh spinach contaminated with E.coli. That scare ended up costing California spinach growers about $80 million in sales that year.<\/p>\n

One of the possible causes for the 2006 deadly outbreak could have been wildlife such as deer or wild pigs who defecated near crops, although the exact cause was never determined. In response to the outbreak, the farmers, the packers, and the shippers created new standards to help head off another contamination outbreak. According to the report, however, none of the standards directly related to wildlife. Many farmers, however, aren’t taking any chances at losing their crops so they are taking measures way beyond the new standards. Measures like:<\/p>\n