{"id":3621,"date":"2008-09-29T10:24:12","date_gmt":"2008-09-29T16:24:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wordpress-367309-1145705.cloudwaysapps.com\/?p=3621"},"modified":"2008-09-29T10:24:12","modified_gmt":"2008-09-29T16:24:12","slug":"give-me-your-vote-and-ill-give-you-clean-abundant-energy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sustainablog.org\/articles\/give-me-your-vote-and-ill-give-you-clean-abundant-energy\/","title":{"rendered":"Give Me Your Vote, and I’ll Give You Clean, Abundant Energy…"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"wind<\/a>Sound familiar?\u00a0 Unless you’ve had your head stuck in the sand for the past couple of months, you’ve heard variations on this statement from both Barack Obama<\/a> and John McCain<\/a>… countless times. High gas and utility prices have collided with a stagnant economy,\u00a0 and energy issues (and the environmental issues accompanying them) have come to the front and center of the ’08 election cycle.<\/h4>\n

My colleagues at Red, Green and Blue<\/a> have done a thorough job of covering the policy proposals of the presidential candidates. But the devil’s in the details, and NPR’s Talk of the Nation: Science Friday<\/em> held a fascinating discussion<\/a> last week on the issues that aren’t being covered in the political rhetoric: namely, the economic and technological challenges that both government and the private sector will have to address to get us to a clean energy future. Host Ira Flatow, New York University professor emeritus of physics Martin Hoffert<\/a>, and Wallace S. Wilson Fellow in energy studies and associate director of the energy program at Rice University Amy Myers Jaffe<\/a> took a look at the bigger picture of our energy challenges, and the kinds of leadership a new presidential administration will have to exert in order to facilitate rapid, even revolutionary, changes in how we power ourselves.<\/p>\n

Among the questions raised during the discussion:<\/p>\n

Who’ll take the lead: the private sector or government?<\/strong> While Hoffert and Jaffe held different opinions on whether business or government would provide the main stimulus for clean energy development, both agreed that major government action was necessary, and that current levels of funding for research were a small fraction of what’s necessary.<\/p>\n

How long will it take?<\/strong> A ten-year time frame has taken hold of this debate, stemming in part from former Vice President Al Gore’s challenge issued in July<\/a>. Rather than focusing on that particular time line, though, Hoffert and Jaffe offered ideas for making the sense of urgency implied in that framework a reality. Though Jaffe noted specifically that simplistic statements like “we can be completely powered by solar energy in a decade” ignore the technological and economic realities we face, both encouraged the political establishment to take concrete steps based on defined aggressive goals.\u00a0 Ideas included:<\/p>\n