{"id":5188,"date":"2009-12-21T10:09:42","date_gmt":"2009-12-21T16:09:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.sustainablog.org\/?p=5188"},"modified":"2009-12-21T10:09:42","modified_gmt":"2009-12-21T16:09:42","slug":"online-shopping-how-green-is-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sustainablog.org\/articles\/online-shopping-how-green-is-it\/","title":{"rendered":"Online Shopping: How Green is It?"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Online Shopping Survey conducted by GfK<\/a> in 2008 showed that about 70 % of people<\/strong> think shopping online is good for the environment as it helps to reduce the carbon footprint. But is it really that simple?<\/p>\n

Too many variables come in to play: when you live, how much you buy, who delivers the purchase., etc. This post overviews 4 main factors to compare the impact of conventional versus online shopping: carbon dioxide emissions, product packaging, shopping research and product storage.<\/p>\n

With actually quite a few “buts” coming here and there, online shopping seems a bit greener which is visualized via the following table (red indicates a greater impact):<\/p>\n

\"online
\n<\/p>\n

Carbon Dioxide Emissions<\/h2>\n

\n

\"ImgImg src<\/a> by Adam Swank<\/a><\/p>\n

The most recent research conducted by Logistics Research Centre<\/a> at Heriot-Watt University in March 2009 compared the carbon footprints of online and conventional shopping. The research was based on two absolutes:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The buyer drives<\/em> to the mall (instead of using public transport);<\/li>\n
  2. The person buys fewer<\/em> than than 24 small, non-food items (instead of buying in bulk).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    According to the research, an average trip to the mall produces 4,274 g of carbon dioxide, while a typical van-based delivery creates about 180 g (which makes online shopping approximately 24 times greener). Thus, when both of the above absolutes are true, online shopping turns eco-friendlier than conventional shopping in terms of carbon dioxide emissions.<\/p>\n

    You can download the whole research paper here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    The research deliberately disregards the following cases:<\/p>\n