Transport of the Future: Heretical Thinking about How We Get Around

Do we spend too much time considering the climate impact of our transportation choices, and acting accordingly? That’s a heretical question in many of the circles that I move in… but, according to Andrew Winston in the video above, those are exactly the kinds of questions we need to ask in order to deal with the massive challenge of moving people around efficiently in a growing and more urban world.

Winston is just one of the participants in Energy Opportunities Smarter Mobility brainstorm sponsored by CNBC, the Harvard Business Review, and Shell Oil. The event aims to bring people together to discuss transportation of the future that meets our mobility needs in a manner that not only lightens the environmental impact of this sector,but also takes into account the social and economic impacts of allowing 7-9 billion people to move around freely.

For instance, why would Ford Motors openly wonder if selling cars to that many people is a smart move… for the planet, or for automakers? Bill Ford, another participant, reflects on the concept of “global gridlock,” and the notion that it doesn’t just cut into productivity and exact an environmental cost; it also becomes a human rights challenge when we realize that emergency vehicles would be slowed down by the increased traffic, or that it would cost more to move goods into urban areas. And Jaime Lerner, the former mayor of Curitiba, Brazil, and an urban planner, notes that reorganizing transportation infrastructure for more livable cities doesn’t have to be an outrageously expensive proposition… in fact, thinking in terms of smaller budgets might drive creativity more, and create better solutions (such as Curitiba’s widespread “pedestrianization” and model rapid-transit bus system).

Heretical to say that carbon emissions shouldn’t be focus #1? Perhaps, but combining it with other challenges pushes us to stretch beyond plug-in vehicles and biofuels to transportation solutions that meet multiple needs… all while keeping those greenhouse gases in check, too.

Want to participate in this global brainstorm on smarter mobility in a growing, wealthier, and more urbanized world? You can… just register at the Energy Opportunities site. If you come up with something particularly novel, or come across someone else’s idea that strikes you as boundary-shifting, make sure to let us know about it…

Image credit: mathplourde at Flickr under a Creative Commons license

About the Author

Jeff McIntire-Strasburg is the founder and editor of sustainablog. You can keep up with all of his writing at Facebook, and at
  • I think this is great. Not only does it navigate around the hive-think of single-focus interest groups, it engages those who might not normally be involved in the discussion at all.

    More brains, more ideas. In this situation, a very good thing.

    • I agree, Rich… challenging prevailing mindsets (even when we agree with them) and making connections between seemingly unrelated ideas are the hallmarks of creativity… and, boy, do we need that!

  • Public transportation projects should be a priority. It’s too bad the high speed train project got turned down by so many (short-sighted) state governors.
    A well thought-out public transportation long-term policy will reduce carbon emissions much more than continuing to sell individual cars, even when they get 50MPG.

  • Pingback: Smart Homes, Smart Cities Markets To Double By 2017 | CleanTechnica()

  • Pingback: Green Transportation: Your Best Choices [Infographic] | Sustainablog()